A person injured in an out-of-state motor vehicle crash is not eligible for personal injury protection benefits through the Michigan Assigned Claims Plan, and that eligibility is not supported by opposing sections of the No-Fault Act, a unanimous Court of Appeals panel ruled Thursday.
A mother's parental rights were terminated in error by the Lenawee Circuit Court because notices and summonses were improperly served and because the mother lacked effective counsel, a unanimous Court of Appeals panel ruled Thursday.
An order quashing a defendant's charges for marijuana manufacturing and possession of a firearm were affirmed Thursday by a unanimous Court of Appeals panel.
An estate can seek work-loss benefits when filing a wrongful death lawsuit stemming from a traffic crash, the Court of Appeals has ruled in a case highlighting the difference between a suit under the auto no-fault law and one under the wrongful death act.
A Court of Appeals panel on Thursday unanimously held that inverse condemnation claims raised by the plaintiffs in a class action lawsuit seeking damages for the 2020 Edenville Dam breach can move forward.
The Chippewa Circuit Court abused its discretion when it entered an order for resentencing in a domestic violence case because the defendant's motion for reconsideration lacked merit, a unanimous Court of Appeals panel ruled Thursday.
The Wayne Circuit Court erred by denying a defendant summary disposition in a judicial foreclosure case because the court failed to properly interpret and apply state law, a unanimous Court of Appeals panel ruled Thursday.
Revocations of assignment from medical providers made during a transportation-based personal injury lawsuit did not save their claims from being barred by Michigan's "one-year-back" rule on filing timely insurance complaints, the Court of Appeals ruled in a unanimous decision issued Thursday.
An email sent by Michigan Automobile Insurance Placement Fund to Beaumont Health notifying the health system to collect all information in support of a patient's personal injury protection claim served as reasonable start date for disputed penalty interest and attorney fees in a subsequent lawsuit, the Court of Appeals ruled in a unanimous decision issued Thursday.
A divided Court of Appeals panel called for a conflict panel to resolve differing rulings from the appellate court on whether litigants followed the required filing deadlines during administrative orders from the Supreme Court to accommodate the COVID-19 emergency.